Game 11 in the 2007 RHP Championship was my black game against Gatecrasher.
I used to have a very good grip on Gatecrasher earlier, but in recent games he’s beaten me on several occasions. In this tournament I seem to have gotten back on track. At least I beat Gatecrasher this time!
The game was very exciting and extremely complicated. The Opocensky variation of Sicilian Najdorf turned into wild complications in middle game and at no point in the game I felt completely sure of victory - not until Gatecrasher resigned at move 40 because he reached the same conclusion as I hoped for: The black queen and rook are forcing a win by taking all white pawns and eventually forcing white into a lost position.
Play through annotated game:
Gatecrasher-cludi 0-1
PGN of game:
[Event "2007 Championship"]
[Site "http://www.redhotpawn.com"]
[Date "2007.09.27"]
[Round "3"]
[White "Gatecrasher"]
[Black "cludi"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "B90"]
[PlyCount "80"]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 a6 {My beloved Najdorf once again…} 6. Be3 Ng4 {This has been my prefered way of playing against 6.Be3 since I was faced with myself against wilfried some time ago. It’s called the opocensky variation and has been played by Topalov and others} 7. Bg5 h6 8. Bh4 g5 {This variation is a very atypical sicilian. Both sides have awkwardly placed pieces and black’s pawn structure is very different…But the line is perfectly playable although it’s definitely not textbook stuff, since black is neglecting several of the traditional opening “rules”. Just think of the “Never move a piece twice in the opening”…} 9. Bg3 Bg7 10. h3 Ne5 {I prefer this square for the knight, but Nf6 of course playable as well} 11.Nf5 {Threatening on g7 and forcing black to exchange bishop for knight} Bxf5 12. exf5 Nbc6 {This line has been played several times before and I believe white is only marginally better} 13. Nd5 e6 14. fxe6 fxe6 15. Ne3 {Black’s pawn structure is somewhat unusual: 3 pawn islands, which is not too recommendable as they can be very hard to defend properly. The good news is that black has the half-open c and f files at his disposal.} O-O 16. c3 d5 17. Qb3 b5 18. Be2 Ng6 {To place the knight on f4 and unblock the e6 pawn. Nf4 is closing down white’s Bg3 pretty effectively} 19. O-O {I was a little surprised that Gatecrasher decided to castle short. Although his previous move opened up for this, I still expected the long castle. Black’s advanced kingside pawns would be excellent targets for a white kingside attack…} Nf4 20. Rfe1 b4 {Opening up for g7-a1 diagonal and b-file. Black’s pieces are very actively placed at this point in the game and I think black has reached equalization from the opening.} 21. Bxf4 (21. cxb4 Nxe2+ 22. Rxe2 Nd4) (21. Rac1 bxc3 22.bxc3 Qa5) 21… gxf4 (21… Rxf4 22. Bg4 Qd6 23. Bxe6+ Qxe6 24. Nxd5 Qf7 25.Nxf4 Qxb3 26. axb3 gxf4 {and black will have a difficult endgame with very weak pawns}) 22. Ng4 Rb8 (22… bxc3 23. bxc3 Rb8 24. Qc2 h5 25. Nh2 Qf6 26. Bxa6 Qxc3 27. Qg6 {with about equal chances}) 23. Qc2 {I was confident at this point that my connected centre pawns were strong enough to do damage on white. And I was definitely not caring too much on protection of the a-pawn. In my mind this position called for offence, not defence.} Kh8 {I thought it was neccessary to get my King away from g-file and white square and possible knight checks but probably better to play Qg5 immediately} 24. Bxa6 e5 25. a4 (25. Rad1 bxc3 26.bxc3 h5 27. Bc4 {An interesting piece sac suggested by Fritz} hxg4 28. Bxd5 {with VERY unclear position}) 25… e4 26. Rad1 bxc3 27. bxc3 h5 28. Bb5 {Practically winning another pawn} (28. Nh2 Qg5 29. h4 Qf5 30. f3 {And white may be able to defend the position}) 28… Nd4 {Interesting move that gives white some trouble and probably better than the alternative I considered:} (28… Rc8 29. Qa2 hxg4 30. Rxd5 Qh4 31. Rxe4 Bxc3) 29. cxd4 hxg4 30. hxg4 Rb6 {I’m two pawns behind but I have excellent attacking chances in h-file} 31. f3 Rh6 32. Kf1 {Forced move} Qe7 {Initializing the plan Qe7, Bf6, Qg7 to put maximum pressure on d4. I don’t think black can win without taking d4 at some point. Another possible line could be} (32… Rh1+ 33. Ke2 Rh2 34. Rh1 Qh4 35.Rxh2 Qxh2 36. Rf1 exf3+ 37. Kxf3 Qg3+ 38. Ke2 Qxg2+ 39. Kd1 Qxg4+ 40. Qe2 {black has equalized material, but is probably not able to win from here}) 33.Qc3 {Defending d4 pawn} Rh2 34. Rc1 Bf6 {I was definitely not sure of my chances at this point, but I found encouragement in the fact that it’s not too easy for white to defend properly :)} 35. Qc5 Qg7 {This is the critical point in the game: Black is threatening Bxd4 which is very dangerous for the exposed
white king. At this point no excact calculations are possible, it’s more intuition, but I don’t think white can allow himself to grab another pawn, like Gatecrasher does here with} 36. Qxd5 (36. Rc2 Rd8 37. Qc7 {and position is about even because black cannot attack without allowing white perpetuals with Queen and rook entering via c-file}) 36… exf3 37. Qxf3 (37. gxf3 Qh7 38.Re6 Rh1+ 39. Ke2 Rxc1) 37… Bxd4 {I believe white is in big trouble but I’m certainly not sure that he is without escapes. His king is very exposed and
there seems to be no proper defence} 38. Ke2 (38. Bc6 Bb6 39. Rc2 (39. Red1 Rh1+ 40. Ke2 Qb2+ 41. Kd3 Rd8+ 42. Bd5 Qb3+ 43. Ke4 Qxa4+ 44. Kd3 Rxd1+ 45.Rxd1 Kg7) 39… Qd4) 38… Rd8 39. Bd3 (39. Qxf4 Rxg2+ 40. Kf1 Rg1+ 41. Ke2 Qe7+ 42. Kf3 Qb7+ 43. Rc6 Rxe1 44. Qh6+ Qh7) 39… Bb6 {Threatening Qb2+} 40.Qxf4 Rxg2+ {White is forced to give up Queen for rook and bishop after the forced 41.Kf1 Rf2+ etc. Unfortunately for white my queen and rook are able to force a win and therefore Gatecrasher rightfully resigned. I have to admit that I was very nervous that I’d missed something in my analysis of the position and it was a great relief to see the resignation from Gatecrasher.}0-1


Recent Comments